Sharing my strategy with my sponsor (to lead because children were having trouble), led to an order to fall back from a friend. The strategy I employed began with an order from a soup kitchen chef to empower the vulnerable adults and children of the Franklin Avenue corridor; whereby I’ve turned to Joshua and the crossing of the Jordan because it was the land given to the Israelites by decree, or edict, and perhaps, also because it is our fate to live with the consequences of our publications.

To lead a migration, like the priests of old, who carried a tabernacle ahead of the people, without the formal study of the scripture that described it was unwise and premature for me to do alone. Knowing that helped me to let go of my leadership for the time being as I continue to work with my own. I’m not really a priest, even though my name is shared by my uncle, Father Paul who was.

But doubts about him, and the priesthood of my new family's faith in general, were serious as well. Hailing from Eau Claire Wisconsin, and dressing in hand made suits, he wore a Toupee, and looked very much like my stepfather, so I followed up with the other priests of his church by making my confessions. And sometimes, officers that looked like them showed up to ask me to tone my work down E.g.; I took the bright red color off my website, and returned a hand coding, license free and W3C compliant HTML, CSS and JavaScript rebuild that would last.

So folks on the avenue, who sometimes role played versions of the 10 year old I described, portray him as someone who enjoys stabbing people with enthusiasm (this Memorial day, 2025). How the examination of a would could be construed as a stabbing is beyond me, but by way of misunderstanding, we are able to set matters straight. I suppose I could also appeal to the Screen Actor's Guild for relief, but it's not what I do! Admittedly, trying to prove that the poor boy is okay, or demonstrating what actually happened is hazardous too, but only because it calls out a society that can't admit to a rule that has been spanked all over the world and is gaining charge with every strike. Dangerous obstructions, like the misuse of names to describe objections we'd like to be rid of, such as the example of Ely from the Bible, who may have been presumed to be denied tingles due to Ebonic assumptions about the meaning of his name because many cultures do, but we ought to be able to make use of the enourmous contribution of the Internet to be specific about the use of a term and it's meaning with Anchor text rather than censored for trying (English does not confuse the use of a name with difficult content; in English, names are only handles that refer to the person, place, or thing that is referred to, each of which may have significance of their own.

I left my hometown to learn to cope with obstructions I faced by learning to write and publish what I know to be true as a defense from allegations that followed an accident during my youth, which resulted in the study of our human capacity to see and to deal constructively with conflicts that result. But when I arrived to follow up on the author of research I used to compose my Thesis, even my own family's research on the use of neural implants didn't guarantee our opportunity to do so. As a matter of fact, the work of nearly all the pioneers who've led us in our effort has been either covered up, or abandoned due to the abhorance of cruelty to animals, so I returned to Minnesota (which like Switzerland, contains the headwaters of a river), to address my concerns about my daughters allegations.

Like Walter Rudolph Hess, who worked upstream on the Rhine, we may pose the most serious threat to opponents downstream where we're better able to take advantage of a slow moving doe in the river. After all, we're much better prepared to remove the doubt, ambiguity, equivocation that were used to throw us off the true nature of problems we were confronting then. So the use of terms like current, and even names like Hess, which are dangerously ambiguious, may be applied to reach everyone clearly, perhaps even God, Himself, to be rid of the things that we agree are objectionable, not the people that employ them.

The western hemisphere is not as well acquainted with the rule of the right, even though the Coup of 1973 in Chile, under the command of Augusto Pinochet in Chile did manage to wire the planet for the communications we enjoy today. But doubt and confusion about concerns that have been raised by nearly everyone online ought not replace the progress we've made by clearing away the wreckage of the past. Entire lives, even my own, have nearly been entirely lost to the use of equivocation and ambiguity to obscure the truth and doubts about our disclosure only afford us a window of doubt in the minds of those who've been acting upon beliefs about us that we've been completely unaware of for over 60 years. Let it be! Forcing people out onto the streets to make their case instead will not work.

An edict begun by 12 member states in Europe (to share what is being learned about the matter that makes up our material world in the field of Physics) too, will continue to publish the findings of Nuclear Research for all people, so as we all proceed together, we may learn to live more effective lives with better information about ourselves and others. Fermilab, which began shortly after our mishap in the mid 1960s, wasn't enough! International cooperation (and leadership), along with our own dissemination of information as afforded by the Internet ought to be! So we can finally begin the serious work of comprehending what we are now so privileged to know.

Please see also: What I know about my children

IMID